Sunday, February 1, 2015

A633.3.3.RB - Complex Adaptive Systems


An organization that reflects the image of a Complex Adaptive System is actually the one I currently work for, our athletic department at Embry Riddle. Our department is its own entity under the university umbrella because we have our own cultural norms, processes, and people working towards our mission as an athletic department. In the last couple of years our department has been undergoing drastic change as we make the transition from the NAIA to the NCAA. This process is long and rigorous and has tested our organization deeply. There are different rules and requirements that our new governing body has brought upon us and an organization unable to adapt would have failed. According to Obolensky (2010) in a CAS “people are very flexible and systems are open so information is shared and total transparency is gained”. In our organization we illustrate just that. Our hierarchy is rather flat and all of our coaches while having their own freedom, abide by our cultural norms and communicate freely with one another. The past year we have spent learning and communicating about the new procedures required with the NCAA, and we want to make sure that EVERYONE is well informed and prepared for these changes. “There are some clear and strictly followed processes, specially around recruitment”. This statement again describes perfectly our values and procedures that our organization follows. We recruit coaches who have high character and truly have a passion for developing young men and women, winning games is just a plus. Even further than the recruiting of our organizational members, we have a philosophy that our coaches believe in and that is that we recruit the “TOTAL PACKAGE…. The student, person, player… “This means that our coaches recruit student athletes that are great students first, great people with great character second, and lastly great players. This has allowed for us to find our niche in recruiting the best student athletes at the small college level. It has allowed us to enjoy that reputation and maintained our culture because of the people we bring into our family. Our organization has already been adaptive to change for over 20 years. We began as an athletic department with no athletic scholarships to one of the most decorated small college athletic programs in the NAIA. We have never been stagnant and are always growing and looking ahead. Our infrastructure and culture has allowed us to be dynamic and flexible at the hands of change, and in fact we embrace it. Moving forward I don’t think much has to change for our organization. We must continue to hold the norms that have gotten us this far and continue looking ahead to growth and change. We will continue to strategize fluidly about the future state of our organization and remained prepare for any change the environment may require.

Obolensky, Nick. Complex Adaptive Leadership: Embracing Paradox and Uncertainty. Farnham, England: Gower, 2010. Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment